Judgments‎ > ‎Case Number‎ > ‎Writ Petition Civil‎ > ‎

W.P. (C) No. 25049 of 2011 - K. Premajan Vs. Corporation of Kozhikode, 2012 (1) KLT 919 : 2012 (1) KLJ 822 : ILR 2012 (1) Ker. 894 : 2012 (1) KHC 684

posted Mar 18, 2012, 7:41 PM by Kesav Das   [ updated Jul 29, 2012, 7:50 AM by Law Kerala ]

(2012) 236 KLR 805 

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 


PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH 

THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/20TH MAGHA 1933 

WP(C).No. 25049 of 2011 (E) 

--------------------------- 

PETITIONER(S): 

------------------------- 

K.PREMAJAN,AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.ACHUTHAN,KUNIYIL THAZHE HOUSE, MALAPARAMBA P.O. KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 
BY ADV. SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR 

RESPONDENT(S): 

-------------------------- 

1. CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE. 
2. M.JYOTHILAL, J.S.CONSTRUCTIONS, MADUVIL HOUSE,PARAMBIL P.O. KOZHIKODE 673 012. 
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 
R,R1 BY SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION R,R2 BY SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE R,R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY K.T. 

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-02-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 


APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.25049 of 2011 

  • EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED 26.7.2010 
  • EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILIDING 
  • EXT.P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER DATED 30.8.2010 
  • EXT.P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 6.12.2010 OF THE PETITIONER. 
  • EXT.P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE MASS COMPLAINT DATED 23.12.2010 
  • EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 23.5.2011 

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. 

"C.R." 


V.CHITAMBARESH, J. 

------------------------------- 

W.P.(C) No. 25049 of 2011 

------------------------------- 

Dated this the 9th day of February, 2012 

Head Note:-

Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999 - Chapter VIII - Rules 60, 61, 62, 63 and 64  - Construction of a massive building on 3 cents - Held, only one building of maximum three floors shall be permitted to be constructed and that too not exceeding a total plinth area of 150 Sq.meters in a small plot.

J U D G M E N T 


The petitioner is aggrieved by the construction of a massive building by the second respondent on the adjacent 3 cents (125 Sq.mts) of land within the limits of the Corporation. Ext.P1 building permit issued by the Corporation for a three storied building is impugned in this writ petition. The complaint is that a pencil like structure is being erected to circumvent the provisions of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules' for short.) 


2. The construction of buildings in small plots (not exceeding 125 Sq. mts of area) is governed by Rules 60, 61, 62, 63 and 64 contained in Chapter VIII of Rules. Rule 60 of the Rules is as follows:- 

60. Special provisions for construction in small plots:- The provisions in the Kerala Municipality Building Rules shall apply to construction of building under residential and/or commercial occupancy, in plots not exceeding 125 sq.meters of area subject to the modifications in this Chapter: 
Provided that permit shall not be granted under this chapter to one and the same person or with his consent to another person, for constructing different buildings, whether separately or abutting each other, in plots formed by division of one or more plots, he remaining as owner of more than one such divided plots or if that person has another plot abutting the proposed plot. 
(emphasis supplied) 

Thus construction of different buildings horizontally by one and the same person or another whether separately or abutting each other is prohibited in small plots. The petitioner contends that such curb should logically be extended to vertical construction also lest multi-tier buildings are put up. 


3. Rule 61 limits the number of floors to three and Rule 62 of the Rules relaxes the extent of set back when compared to big plots. Rule 63 of the Rules clarifies that the provisions regarding Floor Area Ratio, coverage, dimension of building etc. would not apply to small plots. The petitioner relies on Ext.P3 Circular issued by the State Government which restricts the construction of a building exceeding 150 Sq.meters in a small plot. A reading of Ext.P3 Circular would indicate that only a single building not exceeding the said plinth area can be constructed. 


4. The second respondent points out that Ext.P3 Circular has been issued subsequent to Ext.P1 building permit and cannot affect the construction already started. I agree with this contention even though Ext.P3 Circular is issued by the Government for removal of doubts under Rule 161 of the Rules. The resultant position is that only one building of maximum three floors shall be permitted to be constructed and that too not exceeding a total plinth area of 150 Sq.meters in a small plot. I dismiss the writ petition. No costs. 


V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge. 

nj.


Comments